Skip to Navigation | Skip to Content

User login

Log in using OpenIDCancel OpenID login

Navigation

We promise not to torture or kill you

We promise not to torture or kill you

By Jonathon Narvey on May 24, 2006 - 8:50pm


Vancouver is the centre of an unfolding human rights case, full of
international intrigue, shadowy characters and questionable ethics.

A Chinese businessman under house arrest in his Vancouver condo is hoping Canada's courts will protect him from the long reach of the Chinese government. Lai Changxing is accused of running a smuggling empire worth billions and corrupting Chinese officials. (For the full story by
Steve Mertl, link here).
The Federal Court of Canada has agreed to hear his case to stay an order for deportation. Changxing claims he's being targeted because he's the victim of a frame-up after making enemies of some of China's political
elites.

Official Chinese assurances that he would not be
executed if sent back are not necessarily relevant; once Changxing gets processed through the Chinese prison system, he stands as good a chance of surviving back-breaking punishment in a labor camp or the harvesting of his organs as he does of surviving a bullet to the head.

In China, torture is used routinely to extract confessions. Defense lawyers can be put in prison for defending their clients too strongly. Whether or not Changxing actually did the crime, China's demented joke of a legal system makes it impossible to deport him.

Changxing may be guilty, or not. But his case is not unique, or even all that unusual.
The end result is that people who commit terrible crimes in terrible countries don't have to answer for them, so long as they can escape to a country where the rule of law (as opposed to the law of arbitrary and predatory rules) is followed.

Martin Luther King once said that injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. That statement is as true as ever, but perhaps now it is for a different reason.

Submitted by Ray on May 25, 2006 - 3:43am.

Just yesterday, I noticed a story on www.xinhuanet.com/english/
in which the Chinese government says Canada is not being nice
by allowing this turkey to hide out over here. They really
want him back, and the sooner the better. I say let them have
him - he's not doing us any good here, costing us money for
court actions and etc., so let's send him home to face the music!

Submitted by Jonathon Narvey on May 25, 2006 - 5:05pm.

You have a good point. If he is a criminal, he should "face the music" - but it's virtually assured that Changxing would face torture if sent back, guilty or not. That's not acceptable to me.

Besides, extradition should work both ways. As far as I know, China has still not sent back Ang Li to face our laws for the murder of Wei Amanda Zhao in Burnaby from back in 2002. If they are not willing to cooperate in a murder case, we are within our rights to check all the angles before sending back a suspected smuggler.

The story about the Ang Li case can be seen at http://www.cbc.ca/bc/story/bc_li20040304.html

Submitted by elawcn on May 29, 2006 - 2:07am.

I don't think so, Do you know how much this guy bring to Canada? how much he pay for lawer, how much did he spend in Canada? Look! I would say no any government is stupid in the world. The relationship between government and government is like the relatioinship between two companies. no any difference.

Syndicate

Syndicate content