CMHC 40-year mortgage - good or bad for home owners?
By ebizniz on July 3, 2007 - 11:50am
An article by Vancouver Home Mortgage:
In addition to CMHC 40-year mortgage, Genworth Financial has a similar program for home buyers in Canada. Sky-high house prices are making home ownership less affordable to cash-strapped home buyers. Some economists and housing analysts are arguing that longer amortization is bad for home owners.
The danger in stretching a 25-year mortgage to the CMHC 40-year mortgage is that it will hurt home buyers who in the first place cannot afford to buy their own homes. The program is a two-edged sword. Yes, the lower monthly mortgage payment enable home owners in buying their homes, but it will also likely become a huge financial burden to the home owners. Generally, home ownership under this program will hurt rather than help these home owners.
Here are the reasons and adverse consequences of a CMHC 40-year mortgage:
1) By stretching a 25-year loan to 35 or 40 years, financially weak and cash-strapped home buyers are added to the pool of existing home buyers, causing further house price escalation.
2) A home owner buying a home for example at $342,500 with 10% down payment, has to pay $6,345 (2% mortgage insurance) on a traditional 25 year loan. But, he or she has to pay $8,248.50(2.6% as an extra 0.2% is to be paid for every 5 years over 25 years), $1.903.50 more on the insurance premium required for a 40-year loan.